Saturday, June 9, 2012

Testing for Intelligence?

• Considering a commitment to viewing young children holistically (i.e., a commitment to "the whole child"), what, if anything, do you believe should be measured or assessed? Explain your reasoning. I do believe that children should have testing to measure if they are developing or progressing as expected via their age. Also, I believe that some tests can let teachers and parents have ideas as to where a child needs improvements or is advancing. I also, believe that as teachers and parents learn about how children learn, they are also developing strong bonds and relationships with the children. • In what ways are school-age children assessed in other parts of the world? (Choose a country or region of the world for which you have a personal affinity.) School-aged children are tested in West Germany, the Netherlands, and England just as it is in the US. Standardized Tests are used for special needs assessment and educational guidance and there is some trend toward increased use of graded objective tests. Germany uses testing to measure intelligence, while standardized tests are rarely used because “it was generally found that teachers do not use standardized tests of their own accord, mostly because tests are not tailor-made for what the teachers have been teaching” (Neville, P. T. November, 1986). • What additional ideas, comments, suggestions, examples, and/or concerns related to assessing young children would you like to share with your colleagues? I feel that testing children to see if they are progressing in school is a great way to see if they are ready to move on to higher learning. Also, by watching them in their natural environment, with their peers, and during play, we can really see how a child is developing and grows. The issue of testing can be a way to measure competency, and to measure skills of the whole child, but testing can also discourage children, especially the kind of test that measures intelligence. I feel that observation is the best way to learn from a child. References Neville, T. Postlethwaite. (November 1986). “The use of Standardized Tests in Secondary Schools in four European Coutries. National Center of Educational research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC. (38 pp.). retrieved from.( http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED304455.pdf ).

2 comments:

  1. I like your comment that you made about the importance of observation. Testing is a good tool, but it should not be the only tool used to measure development. In my classroom I enjoy using both formal and informal assessments. One of the informal assessments that I use is observation. We can learn so much about the student's development just through the process of observation.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Angela,

    Thank you for discussing the positive aspects testing and observation. It is true, test taking and observation helps us professionals learn how children learn. I believe that this kind of research and observation is an important and necessary aspect in the field of education especially in early childhood education. This is because new information and research is constantly changing and expanding our knowledge base. This reminds me of how new research has disproved aspects of, even though influential, Piaget, Vygotsky's and even Freud's theories.

    ReplyDelete